Industry insights
11x generates new pipeline through cold outbound AI SDRs. Conversica follows up with inbound leads through email-first AI conversations. This comparison breaks down channels, pricing, compliance, and which platform fits your revenue motion.
Last updated
If you're comparing 11x and Conversica, you're really asking one question: do I need an AI SDR to generate new pipeline, or an AI assistant to make sure no inbound lead goes unworked? The platforms sit at opposite ends of the funnel — 11x is built for cold outbound prospecting at scale, while Conversica has spent nearly two decades automating email-first lead follow-upLead follow-upThe calls, texts, and emails sent after a lead raises their hand, with the goal of reaching them quickly and moving them to a booked or transferred conversation. for enterprise sales teams. Both are credible at what they do. Neither is a fit for every revenue team.
This comparison breaks down where each platform excels, where it falls short, and which buying motion makes each the right choice. I evaluated both based on their current product positioning, G2 reviews, pricing models, channel coverage, and real buyer feedback from forums and independent reviews — not vendor marketing pages alone.
This comparison is written for revenue operations leaders, sales directors, and GTM operators evaluating AI-powered sales automation. You likely have inbound leads arriving from forms, ads, events, or calls — and you're trying to figure out whether to invest in generating more pipeline (11x's pitch) or converting more of what you already get (Conversica's pitch). If your team operates in regulated verticals like insurance, mortgage, healthcare, education, or financial services, that compliance dimension matters even more.
| Capability | 11x | Conversica |
|---|---|---|
| Primary motion | Cold outbound prospecting (AI SDR) | Inbound lead follow-up and nurturing |
| Flagship product | Alice — AI SDR for cold email, calls, LinkedIn | Revenue Digital Assistants — AI email + SMS lead nurture |
| Inbound offering | Julian (separate SKU) | Core product — built around inbound |
| Channels | Email, phone, LinkedIn, SMS | Email, SMS |
| Voice agents | Yes (Julian, separate SKU) | No native voice agent capability |
| G2 rating | 4.4/5 (32 reviews) | 4.5/5 (187 reviews) |
| Pricing floor | $5,000+/month (custom, not public) | $2,999/month + $5,000–$15,000 setup |
| Contract model | Annual / multi-year | Annual |
| Target buyer | B2B SaaS / tech sales orgs | Enterprise sales teams with high lead volume |
| CRM integrations | Sales-stack basics (Salesforce, HubSpot) | Salesforce, HubSpot, Microsoft Dynamics |
| Compliance posture | TCPA/DNC exposure on cold outbound | Lower risk — operates on opted-in leads |
| Setup time | Weeks (onboarding + ICP definition) | Weeks (RDA configuration + CRM integration) |
11x and Conversica solve fundamentally different problems in the revenue funnel. Understanding this distinction is the single most important factor in choosing between them — because buying the wrong one means paying for capability you won't use and missing the capability you actually need.
11x describes itself as an 'AI growth platform' that runs the work of filling your pipeline. The flagship product is Alice, an AI SDR that researches prospects, builds ICP-matched lists, writes cold email sequences, sends LinkedIn outreach, and makes cold calls at scale. The newer Julian product handles inbound calls and lead resurrection, but Julian is sold as a separate SKU — you stack Alice and Julian together to approximate full-funnel coverage.
The platform has raised $70M from a16z and Benchmark, and positions itself as a digital worker rather than a tool. Alice is designed to operate autonomously: she researches accounts, crafts outreach, books meetings, and hands off to human reps when a prospect shows interest. For B2B SaaS companies that genuinely need more top-of-funnel pipeline and have the data infrastructure (ZoomInfo, Apollo, Clay) to feed Alice, the value proposition is clear.
However, recurring themes in G2 reviews and independent assessments point to opaque pricing as a significant friction point. A detailed review on ColdReach notes that 'the most common concerns are opaque pricing, setup overhead, reported analytics limitations, message quality that can feel generic in some cases, and usage visibility and contract rigidity.' A Reddit thread on r/SaaS warns that AI SDR tools like 11x 'will cost you a fortune, burn through all your leads, and in the best-case scenario, it might bring you a few leads — at a minimum of $1,000 per meeting.' While that review reflects one user's experience, the pattern of pricing opacity and setup overhead appears across multiple sources.
Conversica has been in the AI sales assistant space since 2007 — longer than almost any competitor in this category. The platform's Revenue Digital Assistants (RDAs) autonomously email and text inbound leads, qualify them through two-way AI conversations, and hand off interested prospects to human reps. With 187 G2 reviews at a 4.5/5 average and a claimed 1.5 billion conversations powered, Conversica has the enterprise track record to be taken seriously.
Conversica's core strength is persistent, multi-touch follow-up on leads that would otherwise go cold. The platform is designed for teams that generate significant inbound volume — from events, ads, content, webinars — but lack the sales capacity to follow up with every lead individually. The RDA engages each lead in a personalized email or SMS conversation, determines whether they're sales-ready, and routes qualified prospects to the right rep.
The main limitations cited in reviews and independent assessments center on pricing and channel coverage. At $2,999/month minimum with annual contracts and $5,000–$15,000 in setup fees, Conversica is an enterprise investment that excludes mid-market teams. Reviewers also note that the AI, while effective for standard qualification flows, 'still has limitations when it comes to handling more nuanced or unexpected responses from leads.' The platform is email-first — it does not offer native AI voiceAI voiceAn artificially generated, natural-sounding voice produced by a TTS model. Thoughtly supports a library of AI voices and brand-specific cloning. agents, which means teams that need voice-based speed-to-lead or call-center automation need a separate solution.
11x covers more channels as part of its core outbound motion: cold email, cold calling via Julian, LinkedIn outreach, and SMS. For B2B SaaS teams running account-based outbound, that multi-channel breadth is a genuine advantage — LinkedIn, in particular, is a channel Conversica does not offer.
Conversica operates on email and SMS. Those are the two channels that matter most for inbound lead follow-up, and the platform handles them well with automated, conversational AIConversational AIAI designed to understand and respond through natural conversation, including voice agents, chat agents, and other language-based interfaces. that persists through multiple touch points. But the absence of native voice agentVoice agentAn autonomous, conversational interface that interacts with humans over the phone — answering, qualifying, and routing calls without human staffing. capability is a meaningful gap for teams that need sub-60-second speed-to-lead — where calling a form-fill lead before they close the tab is the entire conversion strategy. Email and SMS follow-upSMS follow-upSMS follow-up is the use of compliant two-way text messages to continue a lead conversation after a form fill, missed call, voicemail, or prior interaction. alone won't win that race.
This is also where Thoughtly's positioning is relevant: Thoughtly combines voice, SMS, and email in a single platform, with sub-60-second speed-to-lead on inbound form fills. For teams in high-consideration consumer verticals — insurance, mortgage, real estate, education enrollment, elective healthcare — voice-first contact is often the difference between a converted lead and a lost one. Neither 11x nor Conversica is built for that specific motion.
Neither platform publishes pricing on their website, which is a common pattern in enterprise AI sales tools. Based on third-party reviews and buyer reports:
Both platforms require a significant annual commitment. The key pricing difference is that 11x's per-SKU model means you pay separately for outbound and inbound, while Conversica bundles inbound follow-up into one platform — but without voice or LinkedIn channels.
11x integrates with the core B2B sales stack: Salesforce, HubSpot, and tools like ZoomInfo, Apollo, and Clay for prospect data. The integration model is designed for outbound — pulling prospect lists, enriching accounts, and writing meeting bookings back to the CRMCRMThe system of record for leads, contacts, deals, and activity. Thoughtly reads from and writes to your CRM continuously.. Two-way CRM syncCRM syncCRM sync is the two-way flow of lead records, conversation notes, outcomes, and next steps between an AI agent platform and a CRM so human teams inherit current pipeline instead of manual updates. exists but is more partial than native, according to Thoughtly's compare-page analysis.
Conversica integrates with Salesforce, HubSpot, and Microsoft Dynamics. The integration is built around lead assignment and routing — when a lead comes in, the RDA takes over the follow-up conversation and updates the CRM record with qualification status and engagement history. The data model is well-suited for enterprise marketing-sourced leads that flow through MA-to-CRM handoffs.
For comparison, Thoughtly offers two-way CRM write-backCRM write-backUpdating the CRM after an interaction with call outcomes, transcripts, qualification answers, notes, appointments, dispositions, and next-step fields. with Salesforce, HubSpot, Zoho, Pipedrive, Attio, and 200+ integrations via Make, Zapier, and native connectors. The difference matters most for teams whose CRM is the system of recordSystem of recordThe authoritative system where customer, lead, policy, loan, appointment, or account data is stored and updated. and whose AI agent needs to both read lead context and write back conversation outcomes, booking details, and qualification data — not just log activities.
This is where the two platforms diverge sharply from each other and from the broader market.
11x's flagship Alice is built for cold outbound prospecting. Cold AI-driven cold calling and cold emailing carry TCPATCPAUS federal law governing telemarketing calls and SMS. Thoughtly enforces consent capture, time-of-day windows, and DNC scrubbing automatically. exposure, state DNC list requirements, and consent risks that compound in regulated verticals like insurance, mortgage, healthcare, and financial services. For B2B SaaS companies targeting tech buyers, this compliance surface is manageable. For revenue teams in regulated consumer industries, it's a significant operational risk — not because 11x can't comply, but because the cold-outbound motion itself introduces compliance dependencies that don't exist when you're only contacting leads who raised their hand.
Conversica operates on opted-in inbound leads, which materially reduces compliance exposure. The platform supports consent managementConsent managementConsent management is the process of recording, honoring, and updating a lead's permission for calls, texts, emails, and opt-outs across every follow-up channel. and opt-outOpt-outA recipient’s request to stop receiving calls or messages. Compliant systems must capture opt-outs and suppress future outreach where required. handling within its email and SMS flows. However, Conversica does not advertise HIPAAHIPAAThe US health privacy law that governs protected health information. Healthcare voice and SMS workflows must handle PHI with appropriate safeguards., GLBAGLBAUS federal law governing financial-services privacy. Thoughtly's controls and retention policies are aligned with GLBA's safeguards rule., or specific regulated-vertical certifications on its marketing pages — teams in healthcare, financial services, or insurance should verify compliance posture directly.
Thoughtly's positioning here is distinct: inbound-only by design, with consent mode, suppression lists, quiet hoursQuiet hoursTime windows when outbound calls or texts should not be sent, based on legal rules, customer preferences, or business policy., DNC scrubbingDNC scrubbingFiltering outbound dialing lists against federal and internal Do-Not-Call registries. Required for compliant outbound — Thoughtly scrubs every call., and HIPAA compliance features documented in the platform. For teams in regulated verticals, the difference between 'we can be configured for compliance' and 'the product doesn't ship the non-compliant motion at all' is operationally significant.
11x is the right choice when your core problem is pipeline generation, not lead conversion. If you're a B2B SaaS company with a defined ICP, a prospect data infrastructure (ZoomInfo, Apollo, Clay), and not enough top-of-funnel demand, Alice can add autonomous outbound capacity — cold email sequences, LinkedIn outreach, and cold calling at scale. The platform is designed for tech sales orgs that think in terms of accounts, sequences, and meetings booked.
Be prepared for opaque pricing (budget $5,000+/month for Alice alone), setup overhead that requires ICP definition and integration work, and the operational reality that cold outbound quality depends heavily on your data inputs and messaging configuration. Multiple reviewers flag message quality as a watch-out — AI-generated outreach can feel generic if not carefully tuned.
Conversica is the right choice when you have significant inbound lead volume — from events, ads, content, webinars, or partnerships — and your sales team can't keep up with follow-up. If leads are going cold because nobody has the capacity to email them 5–7 times, qualify them through conversation, and route the hot ones to sales, Conversica solves that problem with a proven, enterprise-tested platform.
The trade-offs are price ($2,999/month plus setup), email-first channel coverage (no native voice agents), and AI that handles standard qualification flows well but can struggle with nuanced or unexpected lead responses. If your team needs voice-first speed-to-lead or operates in a vertical where calling within 60 seconds of form submission is the conversion strategy, Conversica's channel mix won't cover that motion.
There's a third category of buyer that neither 11x nor Conversica serves well: revenue teams in high-consideration consumer industries — insurance, mortgage, real estate, automotive, education enrollment, elective healthcare, home services, legal — where the core job is converting inbound leads through voice, SMS, and email with sub-60-second speed-to-lead, CRM write-back, and compliance in regulated environments.
That's the gap Thoughtly fills. Thoughtly is built specifically for inbound lead conversionInbound lead conversionThe process of turning opted-in inquiries, form fills, calls, and quote requests into qualified conversations, appointments, or transfers.: voice agents that call form-fill leads in under 60 seconds, SMS and email follow-upEmail follow-upEmail follow-up is the process of sending timely, context-aware replies or reminders that keep an inbound lead moving toward qualification, scheduling, or handoff. in the same platform, two-way CRM sync, booking and warm transferWarm transferA live transfer where the agent connects a qualified caller to the right human while preserving context, instead of sending the caller to a cold queue or voicemail., and compliance features (consent mode, suppression lists, quiet hours, DNC scrubbing, HIPAA support) designed for regulated verticals. It's not a cold outbound tool, and it's not email-only — it's a multichannel revenue agent for teams whose problem is lead conversion, not pipeline generation.
If your GTM motion is inbound-first, your leads come from forms and calls rather than cold lists, and your industry requires compliance guardrails that cold outbound can't safely navigate, neither 11x's Alice nor Conversica's RDAs are built for that specific job.
Conversica is purpose-built for inbound lead follow-up. 11x's Julian SKU handles inbound, but it's a secondary product layered on top of the flagship Alice outbound motion. If your primary need is making sure no inbound lead goes unworked, Conversica has deeper domain expertise and a longer track record in that specific use case.
11x offers AI voice calling through Julian (sold separately from Alice). Conversica does not offer native AI voice agents — its platform is email and SMS only. If voice-based speed-to-lead is critical to your conversion strategy, neither platform is a complete solution on its own.
11x pricing starts at approximately $5,000/month for Alice, with Julian as a separate SKU (~$4,000–$6,000/month). Combined inbound + outbound runs ~$9,000–$11,000/month. Conversica starts at $2,999/month with $5,000–$15,000 in setup fees. Both require annual contracts. Neither publishes pricing publicly.
11x's cold outbound motion carries TCPA and state DNC exposure that complicates use in regulated consumer verticals. Conversica operates on opted-in leads, which reduces compliance risk, but does not prominently advertise HIPAA or specific regulated-vertical certifications. Teams in insurance, mortgage, healthcare, or financial services should evaluate compliance posture directly with each vendor.
The core difference is funnel position: 11x generates new pipeline through cold outbound prospecting (Alice), with inbound (Julian) as a separate add-on. Conversica converts existing inbound leads through persistent email and SMS follow-up. 11x is for teams that need more pipeline; Conversica is for teams that need to stop losing the pipeline they already have.
